While it is the objective with pervasive advertising for the technology to disappear unnoticed into the background there is a theory called the exposure effect which states repeated exposure to an object makes an individual more predisposed towards it. The subject doesn’t need to be consciously paying attention to an object in order to be influenced by it. This is of particular interest to advertisers as the majority of advertisements take place as a secondary event and are often not consciously focused on.
The Journal of Consumer Research published a study which examined reactions to banner advertising on web pages by showing approximately 200 college students a five page online document featuring a target banner ad for a digital camera and five filler ads. After reading each page for a minimum of 45 seconds the students were tested on their response to the ads. It was found that after repeated viewing of a banner ad there was an increased ease in the way that the information in the target ad had been processed, which in turn led to a more positive evaluation. (An Examination of Different Explanations for the Mere Exposure Effect, 2007)
According to marketing expert Martin Lindstrom these effects are so strong that even the warning on a tobacco packet can, after prolonged exposure, make a smoker reach for a packet of cigarettes because of the association of the image with the process of having a cigarette. He tested this theory in 2006 with thirty-two test subjects who were all smokers. The test involved the subject lying in an MRI Scanner for about one hour while being shown images of cigarette packages containing warning labels and graphics. Instead of blood flow to the part of the brain that signifies alarm when faced with these warnings they actually stimulated the part of the brain that signifies a craving for something. Hence just the association of the image stimulated the smoker's desire for the product. (Branding Expert Martin Lindstrom - Author, Speaker & Fan of the Consumer, 2008)
References
Image: FreeImages.com/Miranda Knox
An
Examination of Different Explanations for the Mere Exposure Effect. (2007). Journal
of Consumer Research, Inc., 34 doi:0093-5301/2007/3401-0010
Branding
Expert Martin Lindstrom - Author, Speaker & Fan of the Consumer. (2014). New
York Times: Inhaling Fear. [online] Retrieved from:
http://www.martinlindstrom.com/new-york-times-inhaling-fear-2/